In re the Estate of Young
In the Matter of the Estate of Benjamin F. Young, Frank L. Kuhn's Appeal
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
The opinion of the court was delivered by Stiles, J. —
The appellant, as administrator of the estate of Young, deceased, collected $4,300 as damages from the Northern Pacific Railroad Company for causing the death of his decedent. In presenting his final account he claimed nothing as commission, but asked to be allowed $1,333.33 for money paid to himself as attorney for the heir in prosecuting and collecting the claim against the railroad company. The court disallowed the demand, but allowed the usual commissions.
*535 The appellant made the collection and brought it into the estate by his report. We must, therefore, assume it to have been within the line of his duty to do all he did. The law fixes his fees for doing his duty, without anticipation that he will make agreements with heirs for additional compensation, as he claims to have done in this case. Such agreements ought certainly to be so far void that a court of probate would refuse to recognize them in the settlement of an administrator’s accounts. When a lawyer becomes a voluntary administrator, he takes the office cum, mere, and although he exercise professional skill in conducting the estate, he does not thereby entitle himself to additional compensation. Taylor v. Wright, 98 Ind. 121 , Hough v. Harvey, 71 Ill. 72.
We concur in the action of the court below, and the order appealed from is therefore affirmed.
Anders, C. J., and Hoyt, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.