Williams v. City of Spokane
George W. Williams v. The City of Spokane
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the defendants severally challenged its legal sufficiency, and a judgment was entered in favor of the several defendants for their respective costs. The plaintiff has appealed.
The judgment was entered on February 28, 1910. On March 15 following, the appellant and the .respondents, through their respective counsel, stipulated as to the facts “testified to by plaintiff’s .witnesses.” The statement was certified on April 19, by the judge before whom the case was tried, it was filed on July 2 following, and has not been served on any of the respondents. The respondents have moved to strike the statement, on the ground that it was not filed or served within the time prescribed by law.
The motion is well taken. A reference to the dates will disclose that the statement was not filed within thirty days after the entry of the judgment, and that more than four *369 months elapsed before it was filed. The statement will be stricken. Rem. & Bal. Code, §§ 389, 393; State v. Aschenbrenner, 45 Wash. 125 , 87 Pac. 1118 ; McDonald v. Van Houten, 59 Wash. 593 , 110 Pac. 428 .
This leaves no question for our determination, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.