Hendrickson v. Simpson Logging Co.
Emil Hendrickson v. Simpson Logging Company
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Parker, J.
The plaintiff seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries which he alleges resulted to him from the negligence of the defendant. The cause was before us upon a former appeal, from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of the defendant, rendered by the superior court upon a former trial, at the close of the evidence introduced by the plaintiff. That judgment was reversed by this court, and the cause remanded for new trial. Hendrickson v. Simpson Logging Co., 69 Wash. 72 , 124 Pac. 395 . A new trial in the superior court resulted in verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals to this court.
*277 The only question presented to us by counsel for appellant is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, raised in the superior court by motion for instructed verdict at the close of the evidence, and by motions made thereafter for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and, in the alternative, for new trial. Discussion of this question would be little else than a repetition of the views expressed and conclusion reached by us upon the former appeal. We are unable to see that the facts are materially different, so far as the evidence produced in behalf of respondent is concerned, from those shown upon the former trial, which we held were sufficient to carry the case to the jury; and the evidence produced in behalf of appellant upon the second trial does not call for any different decision, as a matter of law.
The judgment is affirmed.
Crow, C. J., Main, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.