State v. Northern Express Co.
The State of Washington v. Northern Express Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
— This action, which was commenced by the state of Washington against the Northern Express Company, a corporation, to recover a privilege tax of five per cent of the gross receipts of the defendant corporation for business done within the state of Washington for the year 1912, has heretofore been before this court; our former opinion being reported in 80 Wash. 309 , 141 Pac. 757 . After remittitur, the demurrer of the plaintiff to the answer of the defendant was sustained. Thereupon the defendant stood upon its answer, refused to plead further, and judgment was entered against it for the amount demanded in the complaint. Prom this judgment, the defendant has appealed.
A statement of the case may be found in our former opinion and need not be repeated here. The appellant now contends that the act of 1907 (Rem. & Bal. Code, §§9161-9168; P. C. 433 §73 et seq.), is unconstitutional, being in violation of § 8 of art. 1, the same being the commerce clause of the constitution of the United States. The points now raised were all passed upon in the former opinion of this court adversely to appellant’s contentions, and for the reasons therein assigned, the judgment is now affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 29 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.