Lloyd v. Calhoun
C. B. Lloyd v. A. P. Calhoun
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*36 On Rehearing.
Main, J.
The report of the majority department opinion in this case, as well as the dissent thereto, may be found in 78 Wash. 438 , 139 Pac. 231 . A rehearing was granted and the cause was reargued. A majority of the court are of the opinion that the action must be dismissed. Since the reasons why the action cannot be maintained are sufficiently stated in the dissenting opinion -above referred to, there seems no reason for further elaboration. It is sufficient to say that we concur in the views therein expressed, and for the reasons there given, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded with direction to dismiss.
Crow, C. J., Gose, Chadwick, Ellis, and Morris, JJ., concur.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Fullerton, Mount, and Parker, JJ.
(dissenting) — We are unable to conclude that the department decision here overruled is erroneous, and for that reason dissent from the judgment directed to be entered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.