Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald Hodel, Secretary of Interior
SAVE OUR CUMBERLAND MOUNTAINS, INC., Et Al. v. Donald HODEL, Secretary of Interior, Et Al.
Opinion
ORDER Appellees’ suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellees’ suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted.
A future order will govern further proceedings herein.
Circuit Judge BORK did not participate in this order.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 7 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior
- Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior
- Dorothy M. Thompson v. Ralph E
- McKenzie v. Kennickell
- Palmer v. Shultz
Most recent
- Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior
- Grant Anthony v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of H.H.S.
- McKenzie v. Kennickell
- Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895
- Palmer v. Shultz
- Dorothy M. Thompson v. Ralph E
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.