TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Florida Sportservice, Inc. v. City of Miami

Fla. Sportservice, Inc. v. City of Miami, 118 So. 2d 232 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 8, 1960
Docket
Nos. 60-126, 60-127
Judges
Carroll, Chas, Horton, Pearson
Citations
118 So. 2d 2321960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2741

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

In a suit in the circuit court in Dade County, seeking certain relief in equity under a lease contract, the chancellor denied equitable relief but retained jurisdiction to determine and award damages and his order transferred the cause to the law side of the court for that purpose.

Being uncertain as to the finality of the order, the plaintiff filed the two above styled appeals, in case No. 60-126 treating the order as interlocutory, a'nd in No. 60-127 as being final.

The case is before us on a motion filed under rule 5.10, Florida Appellant Rules, 31 F.S.A. to review a subsequent order of the chancellor denying supersedeas. After hearing argument we granted the motion of the plaintiff-appellant for supersedeas, as will be evidenced by a separate order which also fixes the amount and conditions of the supersedeas bond.

It becomes necessary to determine in which of the two above styled appeals the order for supersedeas herein shall be granted. The chancellor’s denial of the relief sought in equity did not complete the judicial labor in the trial court when jurisdiction was reserved to determine and award damages, even though the cause was transferred to the law side of the court for that purpose. See Hart v. Kapnias, 157 Fla. 846 , 27 So.2d 145 ; Hodges v. Logan, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 885 ; Amatrudi v. Blake, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 416 .

Accordingly, appeal No. 60-127 is dismissed by this court sua sponte. The su-persedeas is granted in the interlocutory appeal No. 60-126, and further proceedings shall be in the latter appeal.

It is so ordered.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11961: 11963: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kingdon v. Walker156 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  2. Storer v. Florida Sportservice, Inc.125 So. 2d 906 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
  3. Florida Sportservice, Inc. v. City of Miami125 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1960)

Most recent

  1. Kingdon v. Walker156 So. 2d 208 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
  2. Storer v. Florida Sportservice, Inc.125 So. 2d 906 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
  3. Florida Sportservice, Inc. v. City of Miami125 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1960)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Hart v. Kapnias, 27 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 1946) 4
Hodges v. Logan, 82 So. 2d 885 (Fla. 1955) 22
Amatrudi v. Blake, 117 So. 2d 416 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1960) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list