New York State Motor Truck Association, Inc. v. The City Of New York
New York State Motor Truck Association, Inc., Roadway Express Inc., Consolidated Freightways Corp. Of Delaware, Yellow Freight System, Inc., United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Abf Freight System Inc., Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., A-P-A Transport Corp. v. The City of New York, Edward I. Koch, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, Ross Sandler, in His Capacity as Commissioner of the Transportation Department of the City of New York, and Benjamin Ward, in His Capacity as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York
Opinion
833 F.2d 430
NEW YORK STATE MOTOR TRUCK ASSOCIATION, INC., Roadway Express Inc., Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware, Yellow Freight System, Inc., United Parcel Service of America, Inc., ABF Freight System Inc., Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., A-P-A Transport Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Edward I. Koch, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of New York, Ross Sandler, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Transportation Department of the City of New York, and Benjamin Ward, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 133, Docket 87-7419.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 4, 1987. Decided Nov. 16, 1987.
Fred Kolikoff, New York City (Peter L. Zimroth, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, Larry A. Sonnenshein, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellants.
Mark L. Davidson, Washington, D.C. (John C. Kirtland, Thomas M. Keeling, Frederick J. Killion, Bishop, Cook, Purcell & Reynolds, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before KAUFMAN, PIERCE, and MINER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles Haight, Judge, granting the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from implementing and enforcing Article 19 of New York City's Traffic Rules and Regulations, as revised, and from an order denying defendants' subsequent motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to limit the scope of the injunction. The order denying the Rule 59(e) motion is affirmed; the order granting a preliminary injunction is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by Judge Haight in his lengthy opinion, reported at 654 F.Supp. 1521 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.