TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Morris May v. Chester J. Gray Harold Ferguson

May v. Chester J. Gray Harold Ferguson, 833 F.2d 1012 (6th Cir. 1987)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 18, 1987
Docket
No. 87-3697
Citations
833 F.2d 10121987 WL 389851987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15211
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

833 F.2d 1012

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Chester J. GRAY; Harold Ferguson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3697.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 18, 1987.

Before KRUPANSKY and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER 1

The plaintiff moves for pauper status and to amend his complaint on appeal from the district court's order returning his civil rights complaint unfiled. This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the plaintiff's brief, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

The plaintiff is a prolific litigant. On April 16, 1987, the district court entered an order requiring the plaintiff to accompany his complaints with a certification that the issues are based on new facts and are not meant to harass the defendants. When the plaintiff attempted to file the present complaint, he did not accompany it with the documents ordered by the district court. On June 26, 1987, the court entered an order returning the complaint unfiled.

3

We hold that the district court's order of April 16, 1987, is valid. Abdullah v. Gatto, 773 F.2d 487, 488 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam); In re Green, 669 F.2d 779, 787 (D.C.Cir.1981) (per curiam). Because the plaintiff did not comply with this order when he attempted to file his complaint, we hold that the June 26, 1987 order is also valid. Finally, we hold that it would not be appropriate for this court to address the motion to amend the complaint.

4

The motions for pauper status and to amend the complaint are denied. The appeal is dismissed because it is frivolous and entirely without merit. Rule 9(b)(4), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
In re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, Jr, 669 F.2d 779 (D.C. Cir. 1981) 150
Abdullah v. Gatto, 773 F.2d 487 (2d Cir. 1985) 42

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list