Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.
Clois OSBURN and Anita Osburn, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ANCHOR LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant, Rachelle Laboratories, Inc., Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM:
* IT IS ORDERED that the motion of Anita Osburn, plaintiff, for entry of an order substituting Anita Osburn, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Clois Dale Os-burn, deceased, as a party-plaintiff in place of Clois Dale Osburn, deceased, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing is DENIED. With respect to appellant’s! assertion that “[t]he Court’s opinion is totally silent as to whether the Court’s ruling affects the potential recovery now available to Mr. Os-burn’s heirs under the Texas wrongful death statute,” attention is directed to the last paragraph of footnote 16 of our opinion herein.
*426 No further petition for rehearing shall be filed, and the mandate shall issue forthwith.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession.” Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.