TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sardinia v. State

Lionel Stanley SARDINIA v. The STATE of Florida

Sardinia v. State, 162 So. 2d 328 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 31, 1964
Docket
No. 63-754
Judges
Barkdull, Carroll, Hendry
Citations
162 So. 2d 3281964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4630

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from a denial of an application for relief pursuant to the provisions of Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix. We affirm.

It appears, from the transcript of the trial proceedings, that the appellant had counsel at the time of the trials which resulted in the convictions involved here. Therefore, having had counsel at the time of his trials [even though he may have plead guilty] there is no merit to his contention that he was denied due process because counsel could have made appropriate motions to have the pleas of guilty set aside. See: § 909.13, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 554 , and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 519642026peak 1964 · 5

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sardinia v. State168 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1964)
  2. Smith v. State168 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  3. Swarthout v. State165 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  4. Williams v. State167 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  5. Poss v. State169 So. 2d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Most recent

  1. Sardinia v. State168 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1964)
  2. Williams v. State167 So. 2d 795 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  3. Swarthout v. State165 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  4. Smith v. State168 So. 2d 585 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
  5. Poss v. State169 So. 2d 845 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Jackman v. State, 160 So. 2d 554 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list