TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

John Timothy Edmond v. F. De La Rosa

John Timothy EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F. DE LA ROSA, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Edmond v. F. De La Rosa, 835 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 4, 1988
Docket
No. 87-2852
Judges
Gee, Garwood, Jones
Citations
835 F.2d 871988 WL 61988 U.S. App. LEXIS 9

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

The district court judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated therein with one modification. We modify the dismissal to ABATE that portion of appellants’ claim that challenges his loss of good time and S-3 status. The district court erred in construing Texas law to toll the statute of limitations on a prisoner’s § 1983 action during his confinement. See Winton v. Burton, 582 F.Supp. 1044 (E.D.Tex.1984), citing Johnson v. McLean, 630 S.W.2d 790 (Tex.Civ.App.1982, no writ).

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 12018: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ellis D. Burrell v. Jimmy Newsome, Chief of Police, Port Arthur Police Dept.883 F.2d 416 (5th Cir. 1989)
  2. In re PLX Technology Inc. Stockholders LitigationNo. CA 9880-VCL (Del. Ch. Oct. 16, 2018)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Johnson v. McLean, 630 S.W.2d 790 (Tex. App. 1982) 23
Winton v. Burton, 582 F. Supp. 1044 (E.D. Tex. 1984) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list