TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William Dial v. Zeni-Mckinney Williams Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Dial v. Zeni-Mckinney Williams Corp. Dir., Office of Workers' Comp. Programs, United States Dep't of Labor, 840 F.2d 10 (4th Cir. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 9, 1988
Docket
No. 87-1169
Citations
840 F.2d 101988 WL 122301988 U.S. App. LEXIS 1559
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

840 F.2d 10 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. William DIAL, Petitioner, v. ZENI-McKINNEY WILLIAMS CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 87-1169.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 28, 1987. Decided: Feb. 9, 1988.

William Dial, petitioner pro se.

William Henry Hcowe, Loomis, Owen, Fellman & Howe; James Michael O'Neill, Donald Steven Shire, Associate Solicitor, Ronald Gene Ray, Sr., Office of the Solicitor, for respondents.

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

William H. Dial petitioned this Court to review a Benefits Review Board's judgment affirming an administrative law judge's decision denying him black lung benefits. Because we find that Dial's petition for review is untimely, we will grant the respondent's motion to dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction.

2

Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. Sec. 921 (c) (1982), Dial had sixty days to appeal from the Benefits Review Board's decision. See also Butcher v. Big Mountain Coal, Inc., 802 F.2d 1506, 1507 (4th Cir.1986) (Benefits Review Board's final orders are reviewable in court of appeals if petition for review is filed within sixty days of order's issuance). The Benefits Review Board's decision was issued on July 27, 1987. Dial had until September 25, 1987, to file a timely petition for review. Sixty-three days later, on September 28, 1987, Dial filed his petition.

3

As Dial's filing is untimely, we lack jurisdiction to review the merits of his petition. Because the dispositive issues have recently been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument, grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and grant the respondent's motion to dismiss.

4

DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Abramson v. Ware, 840 F.2d 10 (4th Cir. 1988) 27
Butcher v. Big Mountain Coal, Inc., 802 F.2d 1506 (4th Cir. 1986) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list