Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley
Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Hard WHITLEY, Et Al., Respondents/ Appellees
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988.
ORDER
A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal.
The parties are directed to file simultaneous briefs within 28 days; within 14 days thereafter the parties may file simultaneous responses.
Dissent
Circuit Judge CHAMBERS dissents from this order and will file a separate expression of his views.
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge,
dissenting:
My dissent on our Court’s order for briefs is that I think we had such splendid oral presentations on February 29 that I think we have enough in the record to decide the issues before us without the briefing that was ordered.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
842 F.2d 217
Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Harol WHITLEY, et al., Respondents/Appellees.
No. 88-1688.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Order Feb. 29, 1988. Dissent March 7, 1988. Order March 28, 1988.
Before ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER 1
The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988.
ORDER 2
A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal.
3
The parties are directed to file simultaneous briefs within 28 days; within 14 days thereafter the parties may file simultaneous responses.
4
Circuit Judge CHAMBERS dissents from this order and will file a separate expression of his views.
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
5
My dissent on our Court's order for briefs is that I think we had such splendid oral presentations on February 29 that I think we have enough in the record to decide the issues before us without the briefing that was ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.