St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Earnest
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company v. Mrs. W. E. Earnest
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. Earnest, 296 S.W. 1088 (Tex. 1927)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
We think the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals was correct because the motion filed in the trial court was manifestly insufficient to warrant the vacation of the judgment by default.
We are not prepared to concur in the holdings of the Court of Civil Appeals on the questions of practice discussed in the opinion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.