TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Goebel v. Carter

Mrs. Eleanore Goebel v. R. M. Carter, District Judge

Goebel v. Carter, 77 S.W.2d 215 (Tex. 1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 31, 1934
Docket
No. 6143
Judges
Sharp
Citations
77 S.W.2d 215124 Tex. 3141934 Tex. LEXIS 167

Opinion of the Court — Sharp

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Mr. Judge SHARP

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

Mrs. Eleanore Goebel, as relator, invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme. Court to secure a mandamus requiring Hon. R. M. Carter of Grayson County, Texas, Judge of the 15th Judicial District Court of Texas, presiding in the 95th Judicial District Court of Dallas County, Texas, to set aside an order entered by him in Cause No. 92157-E, Eleanore Goebel v. John F. Goebel, in the 95th District Court of Dallas County, Texas, as of the 21st day of November, 1931.

A writ of mandamus is sought to compel the Hon. R. M. Carter, District Judge, to set aside an order entered in the aforesaid cause. John F. Goebel is the defendant in the original *315 suit and is vitally interested in the order or judgment entered in that cause. He has not been made a party respondent here. As his rights are affected he is a necessary party respondent. For that reason the petition must be dismissed. See State v. Court of Civil Appeals, 123 Texas, 549 , 75 S. W. (2d) 253 .

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court, December 31, 1934.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11940: 11956: 219392026peak 1956 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956) · Dissent
  2. Kelly v. Lobit134 S.W.2d 428 (Tex. App. 1939)
  3. H. M. Cohen Lumber & Building Co. v. McCalla142 S.W.2d 685 (Tex. App. 1940)
  4. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)

Most recent

  1. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956)
  2. Dick v. Kazen292 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1956) · Dissent
  3. H. M. Cohen Lumber & Building Co. v. McCalla142 S.W.2d 685 (Tex. App. 1940)
  4. Kelly v. Lobit134 S.W.2d 428 (Tex. App. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State ex rel. Candler v. Court of Civil Appeals, 75 S.W.2d 253 (Tex. 1934) 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list