Premier Petroleum Co. v. Box
Premier Petroleum Company v. W. E. Box, Jr.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The two points of error in petitioner’s application for writ of error present in different form the same question, thus stated by the second point: “The Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that petitioner is liable for damages shown to have been suffered by Box regardless of any negligence by petitioner.”
We approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals on that question. 255 S. W. 2d 298 . See also Meyer v. Cox, 252 S. W. 2d 207 , in which application for writ of error was refused.
Several other questions were decided by the Court of Civil Appeals, but no points in the application attack the decision of those questions, and we have no jurisdiction of them. Hence, the application is refused, no reversible error.
Delivered: April 15, 1953.
Rehearing overruled May 13, 1953.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
- VIREO PLLC v. Cates
- Vireo, P.L.L.C. Chaetura, P.L.L.C. William Franklin, M.D., P.A. Don Connell, M.D. And William Franklin, M.D. v. Danny Cates CD Testing, Inc. And Eagle Medical Management, Inc.
- Vireo, P.L.L.C. V. Cates
- Hazel Gully v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
- Urban Renewal Agency of San Antonio v. Abdo
- Anderson Development Corp. v. Coastal States Crude Gathering Co.
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.