State v. Todd Shipyards Corp.
State of Texas v. Todd Shipyards Corporation
Subsequent history: aff'd, State Bd. of Ins. v. Todd Shipyards Corp., 370 U.S. 451 (1962). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
We are of the opinion that the decision in this case is controlled by Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U. S. 578 , 17 S. Ct. 427 , 41 L. ed. 832 and St. Louis Cotton Compress Company v. *9 State of Arkansas, 260 U. S. 346 , 43 S. Ct. 125 , 67 L. ed. 297. We are unwilling to take the position that in view of Osborn v. Ozlin, 310 U. S. 53 , 60 S. Ct. 758 , 84 L. ed. 1074 and Hoopeston Canning Co. v. Cullen, 318 U. S. 313 , 63 S. Ct. 602 , 87 L. ed. 777, the Supreme Court of the United States will probably overrule the Allgeyer and Cotton Compress cases. We abide by what the Supreme Court has held and refuse to speculate upon what said Court may hold.
The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.