TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McCann v. State

Arthur McCann v. State

McCann v. State, 60 S.W.2d 451 (Tex. Crim. App. 1933)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 17, 1933
Docket
No. 16014
Judges
Morrow
Citations
60 S.W.2d 451123 Tex. Crim. 6261933 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 316

Opinion of the Court — Morrow

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Burglary is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life-.

The punishment for burglary is confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than two nor more than twelve years. The penalty assessed in the present instance is by virtue of article 63, P. C., 1925, authorizing a lifetime penalty to one who has been three times convicted of a felony less than capital.' In the present instance, to meet the proof demanded, the state introduced certified copies of judgments in which the name of the person convicted was Arthur McCann. There was a failure, however, to make other proof of the identity of the present appellant as the person who committed the offenses on which the judgments mentioned were founded. That the mere recital in a certified copy of a judgment is not sufficient to prove the identity of the accused in the present case is established by many of the decisions of this court. See Goad v. State, 51 Texas Crim. Rep., 393 ; Rogers v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 526 ; Parker v. State, 53 S. W. (2d) 473 ; Bullard v. State, 50 S. W., 348 .

For the reasons stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1939: 11940: 11946: 11954: 119392026peak 1939 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Solis v. Martinez264 S.W.2d 956 (Tex. App. 1954)
  2. Phariss v. State194 S.W.2d 1007 (Tex. Crim. App. 1946)
  3. Doyle v. State145 S.W.2d 876 (Tex. Crim. App. 1940)
  4. Potter v. State128 S.W.2d 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

Most recent

  1. Solis v. Martinez264 S.W.2d 956 (Tex. App. 1954)
  2. Phariss v. State194 S.W.2d 1007 (Tex. Crim. App. 1946)
  3. Doyle v. State145 S.W.2d 876 (Tex. Crim. App. 1940)
  4. Potter v. State128 S.W.2d 817 (Tex. Crim. App. 1939)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Bullard v. State, 50 S.W. 348 (Tex. Crim. App. 1899) 18
Goad v. State, 102 S.W. 121 (Tex. Crim. App. 1907) 5
Rogers v. State, 204 S.W. 222 (Tex. Crim. App. 1918) 4
Parker v. State, 53 S.W.2d 473 (Tex. Crim. App. 1932) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list