TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corporation

William S. SMITH, Jr., and Marion R. Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COOPER/T. SMITH CORPORATION, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp., 850 F.2d 1086 (5th Cir. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 1, 1988
Docket
No. 87-3247
Judges
Clark, Gee, Rubin, Reayley, Politz, King, Johnson, Williams, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith
Citations
850 F.2d 10861988 WL 78526

Opinion

ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion June 7, 1988, 5 Cir., 1988, 846 F.2d 325 )

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAYLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court m active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1988: 21989: 11990: 119882026peak 1988 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Diaz Vicente v. Obenauer736 F. Supp. 679 (E.D. Va. 1990)
  2. Abell v. Potomac Insurance Company858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1988)
  3. William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp.886 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1989)
  4. Abell v. Potomac Insurance858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1988)

Most recent

  1. Diaz Vicente v. Obenauer736 F. Supp. 679 (E.D. Va. 1990)
  2. William S. Smith, Jr., and Marion R. Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp.886 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1989)
  3. Abell v. Potomac Insurance Company858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1988)
  4. Abell v. Potomac Insurance858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Smith v. Cooper/t. Smith Corp., 846 F.2d 325 (5th Cir. 1988) 12

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list