TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Woodard v. State

J. C. Woodard v. State

Woodard v. State, 295 S.W.2d 659 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 21, 1956
Docket
No. 28,757
Judges
Woodley
Citations
295 S.W.2d 659163 Tex. Crim. 6341956 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1197

Opinion of the Court — Woodley

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50 and 3 days in jail.

Judgment was rendered on April 9, 1956, and recites that appellant appeared and entered a plea of guilty before the court.

Under Art. 762 C.C.P. two days were allowed for filing *635 motion in arrest of judgment, and under Art. 755 C.C.P. he had ten days in which to file a motion for new trial.

The time for filing such motions expired and the term of court ended before the motions relied upon by appellant were filed.

The conviction having become final during the March term of the trial court, notice of appeal during said term was requisite in order to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court. Art. 327 C.C.P.

We observe further that the record contains a stipulation that the jail term has been served and shows that the fine and costs have been paid.

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1958: 11968: 11975: 119582026peak 1958 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fouke v. State529 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975)
  2. Brinkley v. State167 Tex. Crim. 472 (1958)
  3. Hogan ex rel. Murphy v. Turland430 S.W.2d 720 (Tex. App. 1968)

Most recent

  1. Fouke v. State529 S.W.2d 772 (Tex. Crim. App. 1975)
  2. Hogan ex rel. Murphy v. Turland430 S.W.2d 720 (Tex. App. 1968)
  3. Brinkley v. State167 Tex. Crim. 472 (1958)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list