TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hughes v. State

Willie Hughes v. State

Hughes v. State, 331 S.W.2d 216 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 20, 1960
Docket
No. 31,355
Judges
Belcher
Citations
331 S.W.2d 216168 Tex. Crim. 6371960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2065

Opinion of the Court — Belcher

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BELCHER, Judge.

Upon a plea of not guilty on a jury trial, appellant was convicted of selling whiskey in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $200.00.

The testimony shows that on February 8, 1959, appellant sold whiskey in Fisher County, a dry area, the sufficiency of which the appellant does not challenge, and it supports the conviction.

No prior convictions were alleged for enhancement in the state’s pleadings.

Appellant testified in his own behalf, and on cross-examination the state’s attorney asked if he had been convicted of selling whiskey in Fisher County in 1951. Over his objection, he answered that he had been so convicted. Appellant then requested the court to strike the question and answer and instruct the jury not to consider them for any purpose. His request was refused and he excepted.

The testimony of the prior conviction in 1951 was not admissible for any purpose, and appellant’s objection thereto should have been sustained and his request granted. Palmer v. State, 154 Texas Cr. Rep. 536 , 229 S.W. 2d 174 ; Davidson v. State, 161 Texas Cr. Rep. 486 , 278 S.W. 2d 861 .

For the error pointed out the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Penix v. State488 S.W.2d 86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Most recent

  1. Penix v. State488 S.W.2d 86 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Davidson v. State, 278 S.W.2d 861 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955) 5
Palmer v. State, 229 S.W.2d 174 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list