TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Green v. State

Floyd Green v. State

Green v. State, 343 S.W.2d 458 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 8, 1961
Docket
No. 32,910
Judges
McDonald
Citations
343 S.W.2d 458171 Tex. Crim. 61961 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 4306

Opinion of the Court — McDonald

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

McDonald, judge

Unlawful possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a $500 fine and six months in jail.

The undisputed testimony reflects that appellant was driving a pickup truck in the city of Abilene and hit a center island in the street. Police officers investigated and saw a case of beer in the back of the truck. The case contained twelve quart bottles of Falstaff beer. Three additional cases of beer were found stacked behind the back part of the seat and a bottle of beer was found in the glove compartment. Thirty-five bottles of Falstaff beer, containing thirty-two ounces each, were introduced by the state.

Appellant, his wife, and a friend each testified that the beer was bought either for appellant’s own use or for som.e friends for whom a party was to be given.

*7 The jury resolved appellant’s contentions against him.

Appellant presents three formal bills of exception in a supplemental transcript. Notice of appeal was given August 16, 1960, but formal bills of exception were not filed until November 22, 1960, which is more than the ninety days allowed for filing bills of exception under Art. 760d, V.A.C.C.P., and they cannot be considered by this court.

Appellant also filed what he termed an “Exception Record.” This apparently contains objections made during the trial, which are here considered as informal bills of exception where they appear in the statement of facts.

After carefully considering appellant’s three informal bills, we find no merit in any of them, and appellant’s contentions are denied.

Appellant filed no brief on appeal.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 11962: 219612026peak 1962 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fowler v. State352 S.W.2d 838 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
  2. Segoria v. State350 S.W.2d 652 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)
  3. Moody v. State356 S.W.2d 441 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)

Most recent

  1. Moody v. State356 S.W.2d 441 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
  2. Fowler v. State352 S.W.2d 838 (Tex. Crim. App. 1962)
  3. Segoria v. State350 S.W.2d 652 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list