Smith v. State
Dan Smith v. State
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
White, Presiding Judge.
In this case the Assistant Attorney General confesses error in that the information fails to sufficiently allege the venue of the offense. The venue is properly and sufficiently alleged in the complaint, but this does not cure the defect in the information. (Lawson v. The State, 13 Texas Ct. App., 83.)
The information will be quashed, but, the affidavit or complaint being good, the prosecution will not be dismissed. The judgment will be reversed in order that the prosecution may file a new information, if so desired. A good affidavit is not vitiated by a bad information. (Johnson v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 545; Orr v. The State, ante, 453.)
Beversed and remanded.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.