Copeland v. Rogers
Lettie A. Copeland and I. B. Copeland, Her Husband v. S. H. Rogers, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Estate of I. B. Copeland, Bankrupt
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
West, J.
— This is a suit brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside a deed of conveyance for certain real *89 estate made by the bankrupt to Ms wife on the ground that such conveyance was without consideration, that it was executed of covin and collusion by the parties thereto for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of the bankrupt and that such conveyance is therefore fraudulent and void.
The material allegations of the bill of complaint are denied by the answer of the defendants. After the taking of testimony there was a decree for the complainant.
Upon this appeal the contention is that inasmuch as it appears that the conveyance was executed more than four months before the date of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy that the complainant can not prevail. This court has expressly held to the contrary of this contention, and there being ample evidence in the record to support the decree it is affirmed upon the authority of Beazley v. Coggins, 48 Fla. 215 , 37 South. Rep. 213 .
Affirmed.
Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Ellis and Whitfield, J. J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(natural guardian of a minor may not use a ward’s property without obtaining court approval)
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.