TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Avery v. Straw

Isaiah Avery versus Alonzo W. Straw

Avery v. Straw, 30 Me. 458 (1849)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1849
Judges
Orally, Shepley
Citations
30 Me. 458
Headnotes
An offer to be defaulted is not an admission of a cause of action in the plaintiff. In this respect, the law was the same prior to the act of 1847, chap. 31.
Summary
Exceptions from the District Court, Goodenow J. Assumpsit upon a receipt for an article, attached on a writ by the plaintiff, a deputy sheriff. The defendant offered to be defaulted for $4. The offer was not accepted. There was no proof that any demand of the property had been made upon the defendant. The Judge instructed the jury that proof of a demand was unnecessary ; that the defendant’s offer to be defaulted, though not accepted, dispensed with proof of a demand. The verdict was for the plaintiff, $16,35 damage, and the defendant excepted. The offer to be defaulted, is to be regarded as a confession or admission of the contract declared on, and leaves nothing but the quantum meruit in controversy. Fogg v. Hill, 21 Maine, 529. It is to be considered like a tender which admits the contract as alleged ; after which the plaintiff cannot be nonsuited. Cox v. Brown, 3 Taunt. 95 ; 1 Camp. 327. It is an admission of the cause of action. Bullen v. Homans, Nev. & Man. 119.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Shepleyorally

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Shepley, C. J. orally.

— There was error in the instruction given to the jury. An offer to be defaulted admits nothing except that the defendant is willing to pay the sum offered, -and no more. Exceptions sustained.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wyman v. Searle128 N.W. 801 (Neb. 1910)

Most recent

  1. Wyman v. Searle128 N.W. 801 (Neb. 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list