Fellows v. Fellows
Fellows versus Fellows
Fellows v. Fellows, 31 Me. 342 (1850)
Headnotes
Though a wife have deserted her husband without cause, for a few mouths, yet if she go hack aud confess to him the wrong and promise a return to duty, and request admission again into his family, and he then refuse to receive her, and for five years neglect to make any provision for her support, such refusal and neglect constitute a desertion, on his part, for which she may maintain a libel for divorce.
Summary
Libel for divorce for cause of desertion. Defendant was defaulted. The parties were married in 1829. There was some difficulty in the family between the mother-in-law and the daughter-in-law. In the spring of 1836, during the respondent’s absence from home, and without his consent, the libelant left his house and resided among her relatives till the fall of 1836. She then went with her brother to the town where the respondent resided, admitted to him her fault in going away, promised a faithful return to her duties, and requested him to receive her to his house. This he refused to do, and said, “ if obliged to take care of her, he should board her at some place she would not like so Avell.” She thereupon returned to her relatives, and has ever since resided with them; the defendant not having made any provision for her support, or given her any permission to return to his house.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Shepley, C. J.
We deem this a case of desertion within the meaning of the statute. Divorce decreed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.