TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mills v. Darling

Preserved B. Mills versus Samuel Darling, Adm'r

Mills v. Darling, 43 Me. 565 (1857)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 1, 1857
Judges
Hathaway
Citations
43 Me. 565
Headnotes
A conveyance by husband and wife of real estate belonging to the wife, and a bond to reconvey given to the wife alone, constitute a mortgage; and not the less so because the wife gave no personal security for the money to be paid, as specified in the condition of the bond.
Summary
On agreed statement of facts. Writ of entry to recover possession of a lot of land in Bangor. The defendant is in possession of the premises as administrator of the estate of Eliza M. Campbell, and also as lessee under her heirs at law, she having died in February, 1856, leaving no children. The plaintiff claims title under a quit claim deed, dated February 1, 1854, from Benjamin G-. Campbell, and Eliza M. Campbell, his wife,i in her right to himself. At the time Campbell and wife executed the deed to Mills, he executed to her a bond of the same date, to sell and execute to her a deed of the premises on the condition that she paid, took and delivered to him four notes, amounting to the sum of four hundred dollars, agreeably to the conditions of the bond. Mrs. Campbell has paid only sixty dollars towards the notes, which sum is endorsed on the bond. Mills has paid and taken up two of the notes, and paid one year’s interest on the other two notes. The notes have always been at a convenient place in Bangor, for her to pay them at her request. The defendant submits to a default, but claims that judgment shall be rendered as of mortgage. Judgment is to be rendered according to the legal rights of the parties.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hathaway

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Hathaway, J.

Benjamin G. Campbell and his wife, in her right, conveyed the demanded premises to the demandant, who at the same time gave her a bond, conditioned to convey the same to her on her payment of certain notes of the same date, given by him to Charles E. Mills, of which she subsequently paid a part only, which was endorsed on the bond.

The question is, whether or not the deed and bond constituted a mortgage. The counsel for the plaintiff insists, that the bond cannot operate as a defeasance within the meaning of R. S., chap. 125, sec. 1, because, “ the deed was from two persons, and the bond to one person,”

*567 But the land belonged to the wife, and the husband joined in the deed merely to enable her to convey it. A conveyance to her, as stipulated in the bond, would have restored to both the husband and wife, the same title to the land which was conveyed by their deed to the demandant. It would have been, strictly, a reconveyance.

It is also objected that Mrs. Campbell gave no personal security for the money to be paid, as specified in the condition of the bond. It was not necessary that she should give such security. Rice v. Rice, 4 Pick., 349 .

The demandant is entitled only to the conditional jugdment.

Judgment as of Mortgage,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Shelley v. Byers238 P. 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925)

Most recent

  1. Shelley v. Byers238 P. 177 (Cal. Ct. App. 1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list