TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Talbot v. Inhabitants of East Machias

Samuel H. Talbot, Jr. v. Inhabitants of East Machias

Talbot v. Inhabitants of East Machias, 76 Me. 415 (1884)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 15, 1884
Judges
Daneorth, Emery, Haskell, Peters, Poster, Virgin
Citations
76 Me. 4151884 Me. LEXIS 81
Headnotes
School agents, not entitled to pay for services. A school agent’s mere election and performance of official duties, raise no implied promise on the part of the town to pay him for such services. In the absence of any implied contract or statutory provision entitling Mm to pay for official duties rendered, a school agent can maintain no action therefor against Ms town.
Summary
On motion to set aside the verdict. Assumpsit for services rendered as village school agent, for the years 1880 and 1881, fifty dollars. The writ was dated July 10, 1882. The plea was the general issue. The verdict was for the plaintiff in the sum of thirty-seven dollars and eighty cents, and.the defendants moved to set aside the verdict.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Virgin

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Virgin, J.

The legislature has imposed upon towns the general duty and responsibility of supporting schools within their respective limits, with such aid as the state shall afford. Dore v. Billings, 26 Maine, 56; R. S., c. 11. To this end they are required to raise money (§ 6), are authorized to divide their territory into districts (§1), or abolish them (§3), and choose school agents (§4). Such agents are public officers whose official powers and duties are expressly prescribed by the statute. E. S., c. 11, §§ 93,.95. Their mere election and performance of official duties, raise no implied promise on the part of the district or of the town to pay them for their services. Walker v. Cook, 129 Mass. 578 , and cases there cited; Holland v. Lewiston F. Bank, 52 Maine, 564; Sawyer v. Pawner's Bank, 6 Allen, 207 ; Hall v. Verm. & M. R. R. Co. 28 Vt. 401.

Assessors of towns are expressly entitled to pay, by the statute. E. S., c. 6; § 102. But there is no like provision concerning school agents. And in the absence of any implied contract, or any statute provision entitling them to pay for official services rendered, no action can be maintained to recover therefor.

Motion sustained. Hew trial granted.

Peters, C. J., Daneorth, Emery, Poster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 11913: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Coggeshall v. Conner1912 OK 21, 120 P. 559
  2. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Twyford1913 OK 422, 134 P. 968

Most recent

  1. Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. Twyford1913 OK 422, 134 P. 968
  2. Coggeshall v. Conner1912 OK 21, 120 P. 559

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Hall v. Vt. & Mass. R.R., 28 Vt. 401 (1856) 30
Davis v. Wilson, 60 Mass. 203 (1850) 20

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list