Swasey v. Ames
John P. Swasey, Administrator v. Hezekiah Ames and another
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Peters, C. J.
The fact that one of the parties to a suit is the representative of a person deceased, does not preclude the other party from the privilege of being a witness in his own behalf respecting matters that have happened after the death of such deceased person, whether the representative party testifies or not. Formerly the rule was otherwise, the statutory provision having been amended since the decision in Kelton v. Hill, 59 Maine, 260. Laws 1873, ch. 145; R,. S., ch. 82, § 98. The legislature deemed it reasonable to allow the living party to be a witness in relation to matters of which the deceased in his lifetime could have known nothing, and about which some one other than the living party may be supposed to be in a position .to testify.
Exceptions sustained.
Walton, Virgin, Libbey, Foster and Haskell, JJ., concurred.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.