TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dodge v. Dodge

Benjamin Dodge v. Eben Dodge Eben Dodge v. Henry S. Page

Dodge v. Dodge, 30 A. 14 (Me. 1894)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 14, 1894
Judges
Emery, Foster, Haskell, Walton, Whiteiiouse
Citations
30 A. 1486 Me. 3931894 Me. LEXIS 42
Headnotes
New trial. On motion to have a verdict set aside as against evidence and for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, it appeared that no questions of law were presented; mncli of the evidence was but remotely relevant; and that portion of it which was more directly relevant was directly contradictory. Held, in this case, that its weight depends upon the intelligence, the character, and the credibility of the witnesses; the evidence claimed to be newly-discovered does not impress the court as of much importance, and it is cumulative in its character and only slightly adds to the numerous contradictions already existing; and a new trial should be denied.
Summary
On motion. The first action was trespass q. c. and the second, trespass on the case, with a count in trover for the conversion of a deed. The actions were tried together and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the first action and for the defendant in the second action.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Walton

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Walton, J.

These two actions appear to have been tried together, and both are before the law court on motions to have the verdicts set aside as against evidence and for new trials on the ground of newly discovered evidence. No questions of law are presented. Much of the evidence is but remotely relevant; and that portion of it which is more directly relevant is directly contradictory. Its weight depends upon the intelligence, the character, and the credibility of the witnesses. The evidence claimed to be newly-discovered does not impress us as of much importance. It is cumulative in its character and only slightly adds to the numerous contradictions already existing. It is the opinion of the court that the motions must be overruled and the verdicts allowed to stand.

Motions overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list