Toyota of Berkeley, a Corporation v. Automobile Salesman's Union, Local 1095, United Food and Commercial Workers Union
TOYOTA OF BERKELEY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AUTOMOBILE SALESMAN’S UNION, LOCAL 1095, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ORDER The motion to clarify mandate is granted. The mandate is recalled. The opinion, 834 F.2d 751 (9th 1987), is amended by deleting the period after the last sentence and adding “, and the cause is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion.”
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(“[T]he appearance of impropriety, standing alone, is insufficient to establish bias,” and “the burden of proving specific facts indicating improper motives rests on the party challenging the arbitration award.”)
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.