TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tillman VAUGHN v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services

23 soc.sec.rep.ser. 525, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 14512a Tillman Vaughn v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Tillman VAUGHN v. Heckler, 860 F.2d 295 (8th Cir. 1988)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 17, 1988
Docket
No. 84-1269
Citations
860 F.2d 2951988 WL 1088691988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14276

Opinion

This matter is before the court on Tillman Vaughn’s request for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 .

The EAJA provides for a maximum hourly rate of $75 per hour for attorney’s fees “unless the court determines that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor ... justifies a higher fee.” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(2)(A)(ii). Vaughn urges the court to award attorney’s fees in excess of the statutory amount. Our review of the record, however, reveals no justification for such an award and thus the request is denied.

Vaughn seeks reimbursement for a total of 93 hours spent on this appeal.

*296 Nearly one-third, 31 hours, of those hours were spent drafting Vaughn’s motion for attorney’s fees. We find this excessive and will award attorney’s fees for only fifteen of the hours spent preparing the motion. Thus, Vaughn will receive attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,775.00, for 77 hours work at $75 per hour.

Vaughn also seeks reimbursement for postage fees and photocopy expenses incurred in prosecuting this appeal. The United States Attorney does not contest the request for photocopy expenses but urges the court to deny the postage expenses. We note whether or not postage expenses are reimbursable under the EAJA is an open question.

See Aston v. Sec’y of Health & Human Services, 808 F.2d 9 (2d Cir.1986) (allowing postage costs as reasonable “fees and other expenses”);

Int’l Woodworkers of America v. Donovan, 769 F.2d 1388, 1392 (9th Cir.1985) (all costs normally billed to client reimbursable under EAJA).

But see Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575, 580 (10th Cir.1986) (costs for postage fees not authorized by EAJA);

Massachusetts Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, 776 F.2d 1066, 1069-70 (D.D.Cir.1985) (postage expenses not reimbursable under EAJA);

Action on Smoking & Health v. C.A.B., 724 F.2d 211 , 224 (D.C.Cir.1984) (postage expenses not compensable under the EAJA). Having reviewed the authorities, we are willing to award Vaughn the $1.54 requested for ordinary postage fees; however, the extraordinary expense for $20.60 to express mail materials to meet court deadlines will be disallowed.

Accordingly, we hereby order the Clerk of this court to award Vaughn $5,813.14, including $5,775.00 for attorney’s fees, $1.54 for postage and $36.60 for photocopy expenses.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1988: 21994: 11996: 12008: 12015: 12018: 12020: 12021: 22022: 219882026peak 1988 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kelly v. Bowen862 F.2d 1333 (8th Cir. 1988)
  2. March v. Brown7 Vet. App. 163 (Vet. App. 1994)
  3. Taylor Group, Inc. v. Johnson919 F. Supp. 1545 (M.D. Ala. 1996)
  4. Evans v. Berryhill298 F. Supp. 3d 1210 (D. Me. 2018)
  5. United States v. $116,850 in United States Currency166 F. Supp. 3d 626 (D.S.C. 2015)
  6. 24 soc.sec.rep.ser. 77, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 14416a Theodore Kelly v. Otis R862 F.2d 1333 (8th Cir. 1988)

Most recent

  1. McGowan v. KijakaziNo. 0:20-cv-02247 (D. Minnesota June 7, 2022)
  2. Terrell v. KijakaziNo. 0:20-cv-00576 (D. Minnesota Feb. 10, 2022)
  3. Latendresse v. SaulNo. 0:19-cv-01769 (D. Minnesota Mar. 3, 2021)
  4. Jacobson v. SaulNo. 0:19-cv-02380 (D. Minnesota Mar. 1, 2021)
  5. Dace v. SaulNo. 4:17-cv-01775 (E.D. Mo. May 6, 2020)
  6. Evans v. Berryhill298 F. Supp. 3d 1210 (D. Me. 2018)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Weakley v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 575 (10th Cir. 1986) 639
Aston v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 808 F.2d 9 (2d Cir. 1986) 98
Mass. Fair Share v. Law Enforcement Assistance Admin., 776 F.2d 1066 (D.C. Cir. 1985) 62
Int'l Woodworkers of Am., Afl-Cio, Local 3-98 v. Donovan, 769 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir. 1985) 26

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list