Braxton v. Glazer
Curtis BRAXTON aka William Braxton v. Hon. Gary S. GLAZER
Braxton v. Glazer, 97 A.3d 337 (Pa. 2014)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED. The Prothonotary is directed to strike the jurist’s name from the caption.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(noting “the absence of an interview does not preclude the ability to evaluate the offender’s behavior through available history for characteristics similar or dissimilar to the criteria set forth in the law for defining a sexually violent predator.”)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.