TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State of Hawaii, by Its Attorney General, on Behalf of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands and the Hawaiian Homes Commission v. United States

STATE OF HAWAII, by Its ATTORNEY GENERAL, on Behalf of the DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS and the Hawaiian Homes Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

State of Haw., by Its Attorney Gen. v. United States, 866 F.2d 313 (9th Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 27, 1989
Docket
No. 88-1651
Judges
Browning, Beezer, Kozinski
Citations
866 F.2d 3131989 WL 49291989 U.S. App. LEXIS 660

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

We affirm on the basis of Chief Judge Fong’s excellent opinion, reported at 676 F.Supp. 1024 (D.Hawaii 1988), which we adopt as our own.

We need only address an issue raised principally by amici curiae, Native Hawaiian beneficiaries of the Hawaiian Home Lands trust: whether the common law of Hawaii required that the United States give actual notice of its claim to the land in question. We hold that the law of Hawaii has no bearing on the type of notice required by the Quiet Title Act. Whether or not the United States is a trustee for the benefit of native Hawaiians with respect to the land, and whether or not Hawaii trust law requires a trustee to provide actual notice to a beneficiary, the Quiet Title Act explicitly provides that constructive notice is sufficient to trigger the twelve-year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(k) (Supp. IV 1986). The common law of Hawaii cannot supersede the clear command of a federal statute.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1993: 12006: 119932026peak 1993 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America10 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 1993)
  2. Western Shoshone Nat. Council v. United States415 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Nev. 2006)

Most recent

  1. Western Shoshone Nat. Council v. United States415 F. Supp. 2d 1201 (D. Nev. 2006)
  2. Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America10 F.3d 649 (9th Cir. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Haw. ex rel. Attorney Gen. v. United States, 676 F. Supp. 1024 (D. Haw. 1988) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list