TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Humberto D. Dipaling v. The United States

Dipaling v. The United States, 867 F.2d 615 (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 10, 1989
Docket
No. 88-1630
Citations
867 F.2d 6151989 WL 8911989 U.S. App. LEXIS 1100
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

867 F.2d 615

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Humberto D. DIPALING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-1630.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1989.

Before FRIEDMAN, PAULINE NEWMAN and BISSELL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The judgment of the United States Claims Court, dismissing the appellant's complaint for lack of jurisdiction, is affirmed on the basis of the order of the Claims Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list