Hawkins v. Hoskinson
Warren R. HAWKINS v. Lillie Mae HOSKINSON
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
BIRD, Judge.
This action involves priority of liens. It will be unnecessary, however, to discuss the merits of the case.
*400 Appellants designated a partial record for the purpose of appeal' and did not serve a concise statement of points on which they intended to rely. Appellee contends that the appeal should therefore be dismissed. Civil Rule 75.04 provides as follows:
“No assignment of errors is necessary. If the appellant does not designate for inclusion the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the action, he shall serve with his designation a concise statement of the points on which he intends to rely on the appeal. The complete record, for the purpose of this Rule, does not include nonessential orders, summons, subpoenas, notices and similar papers.”
Under the authority of Knight v. Resolute Insurance Co., Ky., 321 S.W.2d 255 , we must agree with the appellee.
The appeal is dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.