Jose Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Al Kanahele, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego, California, United States of America v. Raul Chavez-Sanchez
Opinion
871 F.2d 104
Jose GUBIENSIO-ORTIZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Al KANAHELE, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center San Diego, California, Respondent-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raul CHAVEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellee.
Nos. 88-5848, 88-5109.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 1989. Decided March 31, 1989.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.
Before WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
On August 23, 1988, we held the Sentencing Guidelines, challenged in these cases, to be unconstitutional (Wiggins, dissenting). On January 23, 1989, the Supreme Court simultaneously granted a petition for writ of certiorari and vacated the judgment, remanding to this court for further consideration in light of Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 647 , 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1988). United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 859 , 102 L.Ed.2d 984 (1989) vacating Gubiensio-Ortiz v. Kanahele, 857 F.2d 1245 (1988). In Mistretta, the Supreme Court upheld the Sentencing Guidelines against the same Constitutional challenges that we considered in the instant case.
2
Upon reconsideration in light of Mistretta, we affirm Gubiensio-Ortiz v. United States, No. 88-5848. In United States v. Chavez-Sanchez, 88-5109, we reverse and remand for resentencing under the guidelines.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.