TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Coffman v. State

Jerry COFFMAN v. The STATE of Texas

Coffman v. State, 379 S.W.2d 656 (Tex. Crim. App. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 3, 1964
Docket
No. 37018
Judges
Dice
Citations
379 S.W.2d 6561964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1003

Opinion of the Court — Dice

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

DICE, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty and waiver of trial by jury, of the offense of felony theft and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

No statement of facts of the evidence adduced upon the trial accompanies the record, and there are no bills of exception.

The judgment entered by the court orders that appellant be punished by confinement in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than five years. An examination of the record reflects that the punishment assessed was five years. The sentence *657 pronounced by the court orders that appellant be confined in the penitentiary for five years.

The judgment is reformed to provide that appellant be confined in the penitentiary for a definite term of five years and the sentence is also reformed so as to give application to the indeterminate sentence law, Art. 775, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., and order that he be confined in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two nor more than five years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11974: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ancira v. State516 S.W.2d 924 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)
  2. Bertsch v. Beto254 F. Supp. 257 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Ancira v. State516 S.W.2d 924 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974)
  2. Bertsch v. Beto254 F. Supp. 257 (S.D. Tex. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list