TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Domini

STATE of Missouri v. John DOMINI

State v. Domini, 391 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 14, 1965
Docket
No. 51001
Judges
Barrett, Pritchard, Stockard
Citations
391 S.W.2d 2061965 Mo. LEXIS 804

Opinion of the Court — Stockard

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

STOCKARD, Commissioner.

John Domini was found guilty by a jury of robbery in the first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon (Sections S60.120 and 560.135, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) and was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of five years.

The jury returned its verdict on June 2, 1964, and on June 24, 1964, the trial court overruled defendant’s motion for new trial. Thereafter, but on the same day, defendant was granted allocution, and judgment was then entered in accordance with the verdict. Defendant’s notice of appeal was filed on July 31, 1964.

Supreme Court Rule 28.03, V.A. M.R., provides that an appeal in a criminal case “shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal * * * within the same time after final judgment as provided for civil cases.” Notices of appeal in civil cases are required to be “filed not later than ten days after the judgment * * * appealed from becomes final.” Civil Rule 82.04, V.A.M.R. Supreme Court Rule 31.02, V.A.M.R., provides that the trial court “may not enlarge the period * * * for taking an appeal as provided by these Rules.” The notice of appeal in this case was filed thirty-seven days after the judgment became final. The “timely filing of a notice of appeal is ‘the vital step’ for perfecting an appeal and is necessary to invoke appellate jurisdiction.” State v. Robbins, Mo., 269 S.W.2d 27, 29 ; State v. Morrow, Mo., 316 S.W.2d 527 . Defendant’s notice of appeal was not timely and did not vest this court with appellate jurisdiction. State v. Henderson, Mo., 344 S.W.2d 96 ; State v. Crocker, Mo., 335 S.W.2d 32 ; State v. Johnson, Mo., 331 S.W.2d 551 ; State v. Lowe, Mo., 365 S.W.2d 613 ; State v. Johnson, Mo., 382 S.W.2d 674 .

The appeal is dismissed.

BARRETT and PRITCHARD, CC., concur.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion by STOCKARD, C., is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

All of the Judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1965: 11979: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Wagner v. Ruddy582 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. 1979)
  2. State v. Hayes394 S.W.2d 346 (Mo. 1965)

Most recent

  1. State ex rel. Wagner v. Ruddy582 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. 1979)
  2. State v. Hayes394 S.W.2d 346 (Mo. 1965)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 7

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Robbins, 269 S.W.2d 27 (Mo. 1954) 16
State v. Morrow, 316 S.W.2d 527 (Mo. 1958) 11
State v. Crocker, 335 S.W.2d 32 (Mo. 1960) 7
State v. Lowe, 365 S.W.2d 613 (Mo. 1963) 7
State v. Johnson, 331 S.W.2d 551 (Mo. 1960) 5
State v. Henderson, 344 S.W.2d 96 (Mo. 1961) 5
State v. Johnson, 382 S.W.2d 674 (Mo. 1964) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list