TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McGregor v. Commonwealth

Hazel McGREGOR v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky

McGregor v. Commonwealth, 407 S.W.2d 705 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 28, 1966
Judges
Hill
Citations
407 S.W.2d 7051966 Ky. LEXIS 178

Opinion of the Court — Hill

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

HILL, Judge.

RCr 12.54 provides that an appeal to this court may be taken within ten days from the entry of judgment; but if “timely” motion for new trial has been made, the appeal may be taken within ten days after the motion is overruled. RCr 10.06 limits the time for service of a motion for new trial to the period of five days after return of the verdict — except that if it is made on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the motion may be made at any time within one year after entry of the judgment or even later if the court for good cause permits.

Appellant was convicted on October 29, 1965. On December 2, 1965, having failed to appeal within ten days after entry of the judgment and having failed to move for a new trial within the prescribed time of five days, he served a motion for new trial (without a supporting affidavit) on the ground of newly discovered evidence. This motion was overruled on December 13, 1965, and notice of appeal was filed on December 18, 1965.

The rules cannot be sensibly construed to permit an appeal that would otherwise be untimely by the simple device of making a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. If such a motion is made more than five days after return of the verdict, the only reviewable “judgment”’ is the final order overruling the motion; and the review is restricted to the grounds timely raised by the motion.

Appellant has moved for an appeal under KRS 21.140(2). His grounds are addressed entirely to the merits of the case. He makes no contention that the order overruling his motion for a new trial was erroneous.

The motion for appeal is overruled.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 11969: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Boggs v. Commonwealth424 S.W.2d 806 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)
  2. Perkins v. Commonwealth442 S.W.2d 310 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Perkins v. Commonwealth442 S.W.2d 310 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969)
  2. Boggs v. Commonwealth424 S.W.2d 806 (Ky. Ct. App. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list