TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Quinn Wholesale, Inc. v. John A. Northen, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Gordon Foods, Inc.

QUINN WHOLESALE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. NORTHEN, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Gordon Foods, Inc., Defendant-Appellant

Quinn Wholesale, Inc. v. Northen, 873 F.2d 77 (4th Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 26, 1989
Docket
No. 88-1336
Judges
Hall, Wilkinson, Doumar, Eastern, Virginia
Citations
873 F.2d 7719 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 12751989 WL 395061989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5481

Opinion — Hall

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant is the trustee in the bankruptcy filed by Gordon Foods, Inc. (“Gordon”), a North Carolina corporation which was engaged in a retail grocery business. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment to the trustee and denied the cross-motion for summary judgment motion by Quinn Wholesale, Inc. (“Quinn”). On appeal to the district court, the bankruptcy *78 court’s order was reversed and the case was remanded for entry of judgment in favor of Quinn. It is from this order that the trustee appeals. We affirm.

The facts of this case are undisputed. Quinn, a grocery wholesaler, delivered inventory to Gordon on a weekly basis; at the time of each delivery, Gordon would pay by check for the previous week’s delivery. On December 4, 1986, Quinn delivered its inventory and Gordon tendered a check in the amount of $72,444.62 for the previous delivery. The following day, Gordon filed its petition in the bankruptcy court. On December 9, 1986, Gordon’s check was accepted and paid by its bank.

The trustee instituted an adversary proceeding against Quinn to recover the amount of the check. The trustee claimed that the payment constituted a post-petition transfer which was subject to the trustee’s avoidance powers under 11 U.S.C. § 549 (a)(1). The only question presented is whether the transfer of the $72,444.62 from Gordon to Quinn occurred, for the purposes of the avoidance provisions, on the pre-petition date of delivery of the check or on the post-petition date of payment of the check by Gordon’s bank. Relying primarily on a recent opinion by this Court as well as on a case directly on point from the Ninth Circuit, the district court held that the transfer was effected when the check was delivered to the creditor Quinn and, therefore, that such transfer was not subject to avoidance as a post-petition transfer.

In re Continental Commodities, Inc., 841 F.2d 527 (4th Cir.1988) (date of delivery of check dispositive for transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547 (c));

In re Trois Etoiles, Inc., 78 B.R. 237 , 16 B.C.D. 698 (B.A.P. 9th Cir.1987). We agree.

We affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court in its memorandum opinion.

Quinn Wholesale, Inc. v. John A. Northen, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Gordon Foods, Inc., 100 B.R. 271 (M.D.N.C.1988).

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1989: 11990: 11991: 51992: 31994: 21995: 12004: 12006: 119892026peak 1991 · 5

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Tarver v. Trois Etoiles, Inc. (In re Trois Etoiles, Inc.), 78 B.R. 237 (9th Cir. BAP 1987) 10
Quinn Wholesale, Inc. v. Northen, 100 B.R. 271 (M.D.N.C. 1988) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list