TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Laden

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Richard Lee LADEN

State v. Laden, 536 S.W.2d 880 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 13, 1976
Docket
No. 36727
Judges
Dowd, Rendlen, Weier
Citations
536 S.W.2d 8801976 Mo. App. LEXIS 2502

Opinion of the Court — Weier

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WEIER, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was found guilty on Count I of an information of the offense of carrying a concealed weapon and on Count II of the offense of attempted bribery of a police officer. The verdict of the jury was returned on October 29, 1974. Rule 27.20 requires that a motion for new trial be filed before judgment and within ten days after the return of the verdict. This rule also provides that on application of the defendant, the court may extend the time for filing this motion for an additional period of thirty days. A motion for new trial was *881 filed on December 2, 1974, some thirty-four days after the verdicts of guilty. The record does not reflect that the appellant requested or that the court granted any extension of time for filing the motion for new trial beyond the original ten-day period provided in the rule. Thus the filing of the motion was some twenty-four days out of time.

The provisions of Rule 27.20(a) relating to the time for filing a motion for new trial are mandatory and such a motion must be filed within the time provided. Any motion for new trial filed beyond the time provided in this rule is a nullity and preserves nothing for appellate review. State v. Tucker, 451 S.W.2d 91, 92 [1, 2] (Mo.1970); State v. Warren, 469 S.W.2d 662, 663 [4] (Mo.App.1971).

The judgment is affirmed.

DOWD and RENDLEN, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 21977: 11978: 11979: 119762026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Maddox549 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
  2. State v. Harris541 S.W.2d 686 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
  3. State v. Alford576 S.W.2d 583 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)
  4. State v. Skaggs539 S.W.2d 583 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
  5. State v. Lance565 S.W.2d 461 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)

Most recent

  1. State v. Alford576 S.W.2d 583 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)
  2. State v. Lance565 S.W.2d 461 (Mo. Ct. App. 1978)
  3. State v. Maddox549 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
  4. State v. Harris541 S.W.2d 686 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)
  5. State v. Skaggs539 S.W.2d 583 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Tucker, 451 S.W.2d 91 (Mo. 1970) 40
State v. Warren, 469 S.W.2d 662 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list