TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Childers

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. James Dwight CHILDERS

State v. Childers, 581 S.W.2d 619 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 17, 1979
Docket
No. 11041
Judges
Billings
Citations
581 S.W.2d 6191979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2833

Opinion of the Court — Billings

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BILLINGS, Judge.

Defendant James Dwight Childers was convicted by a Maries County jury of stealing property of a value of at least $50 [§§ 560.156, 560.161, RSMo 1969] and sentenced as a habitual criminal to a three-year prison term. Claiming he was entitled to an instruction submitting the offense of stealing property of a value less than $50 1 defendant has appealed. We affirm.

Defendant’s single point is not preserved for review because the refused instruction, tendered by defendant, is not set forth in the argument portion of his brief as required by the rules. Rules 28.18 and 84.04(e), V.A.M.R.; State v. Stuebinger, 552 S.W.2d 338 (Mo.App.1977). Furthermore, defendant’s motion for new trial failed to indicate in any manner what facts in evidence were considered sufficient to warrant such an instruction and fails to comply with Rule 27.20(a), V.A.M.R. State v. Cheek, 413 S.W.2d 231 (Mo.1967).

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

. The only evidence of the value of the stolen television set was $100 by the owner and $60 by a television dealer. .. [A]n instruction on stealing less than $50 need not be given where the only evidence of value is that the stolen property is worth over $50.” State v. Davis, 544 S.W.2d 600 (Mo.App.1976).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1980: 119802026peak 1980 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Willis602 S.W.2d 9 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)

Most recent

  1. State v. Willis602 S.W.2d 9 (Mo. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Cheek, 413 S.W.2d 231 (Mo. 1967) 23
State v. Stuebinger, 552 S.W.2d 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977) 6
State v. Davis, 544 S.W.2d 600 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list