TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

T. A. B. v. W. L. B.

T. A. B. v. W. L. B., 606 S.W.2d 695 (Tex. 1980)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Texas Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 22, 1980
Docket
No. B-9589
Citations
606 S.W.2d 69524 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 411980 Tex. LEXIS 392
Cited by 15

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. 598 S.W.2d 936 .

This action is not to be construed as approving the language of the court of civil appeals that § 11.13(b) of the Texas Family Code prohibits an appellate court from considering no evidence points properly raised on appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 15 cases

View all citing references →
1982: 11984: 31985: 12000: 42006: 32009: 22023: 119822026peak 2000 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Marriage of Robinson16 S.W.3d 451 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000)
  2. In the Interest of A.S., a Child v. the State of TexasNo. 02-22-00196-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 20, 2023)
  3. in the Interest of A.L.E.279 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009)
  4. In the Interest of C.Q.T.M.25 S.W.3d 730 (Tex. App. 2000)
  5. Fambro v. Fambro635 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. App. 1982)
  6. In the Interest of Z.A.T.193 S.W.3d 197 (Tex. App. 2006)

Most recent

  1. In the Interest of A.S., a Child v. the State of TexasNo. 02-22-00196-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 20, 2023)
  2. In re ALE279 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009)
  3. in the Interest of A.L.E.279 S.W.3d 424 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009)
  4. In re ZAT193 S.W.3d 197 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006)
  5. in the Interest of Z.A.T., K.M.T. & K.O.T., ChildrenNo. 10-04-00347-CV (Tex. App.—Waco Apr. 5, 2006)
  6. In the Interest of Z.A.T.193 S.W.3d 197 (Tex. App. 2006)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list