TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Vandiver

STATE of Missouri v. Mason VANDIVER

State v. Vandiver, 613 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Missouri · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 6, 1981
Docket
No. 61844
Judges
Welborn
Citations
613 S.W.2d 6371981 Mo. LEXIS 350

Opinion of the Court — Welborn

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

WELBORN, Commissioner.

Appeal from judgment of conviction and sentence, on jury verdict, to life imprisonment for murder in the first degree and to 30 years’ imprisonment for robbery in the first degree.

By information in the St. Charles County Circuit Court, Mason Vandiver was charged, in Count I, with robbery in the first degree of John Russell Stewart on January 7, 1977. By Count II, Vandiver was charged with murder in the first degree in killing John Russell Stewart, on January 7, 1977, in the perpetration of a robbery. A jury found the defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree and assessed a punishment of 30 years’ imprisonment. It also found him guilty of murder in the first degree, assessing a punishment of life imprisonment.

On his appeal from the ensuing judgment, the sole complaint of appellant is that his conviction for robbery cannot stand, inasmuch as it was the underlying felony relied upon for the first degree murder charge for which he was convicted. Appellant complains that to allow both convictions to stand would violate double jeopardy protection of the federal and state constitutions and would subject him to double punishment for a single offense.

In view of State v. Morgan, 592 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. banc 1980); vacated and remanded, Morgan v. Missouri, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 56 , 66 L.Ed.2d 12 (1980); on remand, State v. Morgan, 612 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. banc 1981); and State v. Olds, 603 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. banc 1980), appellant’s contention must be sustained.

Judgment reversed as to Count I. Affirmed as to Count II.

PER CURIAM:

The foregoing opinion by WELBORN, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All of the Judges concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1987: 119872026peak 1987 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Birr v. State744 P.2d 1117 (Wyo. 1987)

Most recent

  1. Birr v. State744 P.2d 1117 (Wyo. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Olds, 603 S.W.2d 501 (Mo. 1980) 103
State v. Morgan, 592 S.W.2d 796 (Mo. 1980) 80
State v. Morgan, 612 S.W.2d 1 (Mo. 1981) 37
Meads v. Carter, 449 U.S. 808 (1980) 37

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list