TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Tate

STATE of Missouri v. Donald Lee TATE

State v. Tate, 675 S.W.2d 85 (Mo. Ct. App. 1984)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 19, 1984
Docket
No. 47966
Citations
675 S.W.2d 85

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER PER CURIAM:

This is defendant’s second appeal from his convictions, after a jury trial, of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, burglary in the first degree, and two counts of robbery in the first degree. See State v. Tate, 657 S.W.2d 727 (Mo.App.1983). Defendant was sentenced to a total of ninety-five years’ imprisonment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1988: 11990: 119882026peak 1988 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Tate v. State752 S.W.2d 393 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)
  2. Donald Lee Tate v. William M. Armontrout, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary914 F.2d 1022 (8th Cir. 1990)

Most recent

  1. Donald Lee Tate v. William M. Armontrout, Warden, Missouri State Penitentiary914 F.2d 1022 (8th Cir. 1990)
  2. Tate v. State752 S.W.2d 393 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
State v. Tate, 657 S.W.2d 727 (Mo. Ct. App. 1983) 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list