State v. Nolting
STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Eric C. NOLTING
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER PER CURIAM:
A jury convicted defendant of tampering in the first degree, § 569.080.1(2), RSMo. 1982. He appeals from the judgment claiming the evidence adduced at trial does not support the verdict in that the state’s witness was unable to identify him in the courtroom. However, the witness positively identified defendant’s photograph admitted in evidence without objections. See State v. Adail, 555 S.W.2d 672, 674 (Mo.App.1977). We have examined the record in the light most favorable to the judgment and find it contains solid, credible evidence from which a rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.