TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rippel v. Worstell

Barbara E. RIPPEL, Appellant-Respondent v. Charles WORSTELL and Brenda Worstell

Rippel v. Worstell, 767 S.W.2d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 28, 1989
Docket
No. WD 40806
Judges
Lowenstein, Manford, Turnage
Citations
767 S.W.2d 5941989 Mo. App. LEXIS 2541989 WL 16443

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER PER CURIAM:

Direct appeal from a judgment denying enforcement of promissory notes due to the defense of fraud in the inducement. Cross-appeal from a judgment denying recision and cancellation of the promissory notes and related sales contract, and damages. The appeals are consolidated.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list