TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Milton F

United States v. Milton F, 877 F.2d 341 (5th Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 30, 1989
Docket
No. 87-5556
Citations
877 F.2d 3411989 U.S. App. LEXIS 10280

Opinion

877 F.2d 341

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Milton F. JONES, Defendant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Charles CAMPION and Bernard Campion, Appellees.

Nos. 87-5556, 87-5575.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 30, 1989.

Todd Foster, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Edwin Kneedler, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Bernard Campion, Charles Campion, San Antonio, Tex., for appellees.

Kim Robert Fawcett, Asst. Defender, State Appellate Defender Office, Detroit, Mich., for amicus Nat. Legal Aid and Defender Asso.

Joseph Beeler, Miami, Fla., Bruce J. Winick, Univ. of Miami, School of Law, Coral Gables, Fla., for amici--Nat. Asso. of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Nat. Network for the Right to Counsel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, GARZA, REAVLEY, POLITZ, KING, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH and DULE, Circuit Judges.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

1

On February 22, 1988, a panel of this court decided this case, affirming the district court in United States v. Jones, 837 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1988). On April 25, 1988, a majority of our court voted to grant en banc rehearing. Oral argument before the en banc court was heard on September 19, 1988. The en banc court has withheld deciding this case until the Supreme Court ruled in Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered Petitioner v. United States. Having reviewed that case, we find it unnecessary for the en banc court to consider this case further, except to apply the Supreme Court decision in Caplin, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2646 , 105 L.Ed.2d 528 (1989). Applying that decision, we reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings and the entry of such judgments as are appropriate and not inconsistent with Caplin.

2

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989) 701
United States v. Milton F, 837 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir. 1988) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list